Home  ›  what factors led to the annexation of hawaii in 1898

what factors led to the annexation of hawaii in 1898

Written By ۱۴۰۱ فروردین ۲۰, شنبه Add Comment Edit

1893 regime overthrow

The Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom
Role of the Hawaiian Rebellions (1887–95)
USS Boston landing force, 1893 (PP-36-3-002).jpg
The USS Boston's landing force on duty at the Arlington Hotel, Honolulu, at the time of the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy, Jan 1893. Lieutenant Lucien Young, USN, commanded the disengagement, and is presumably the officeholder at correct.[1]
Engagement January 17, 1893; 129 years ago  (1893-01-17)
Location

Honolulu, Hawaii
Result

Hawaiian League / United States victory

  • Surrender of the Hawaiian Kingdom
  • Queen Liliʻuokalani relinquishes power
  • Conditional Government, later renamed a Republic, established
  • Hawaii organized into a territory, and so a state of the United States
Belligerents
Hawaii Commission of Safe
United States		 Hawaii Hawaiian Kingdom
Commanders and leaders
  • Hawaii Lorrin A. Thurston
  • United States John 50. Stevens
  • Hawaii Queen Liliʻuokalani
  • Hawaii Samuel Nowlein
  • Hawaii Charles B. Wilson
Force
United States
  • 1 cruiser, USS Boston
  • 162 U.s.a. Navy and USMC personnel
 496 troops [2]
  • (several) Volunteers
  • 85–110 Police
  • 322–337 Regal Guard
    • 50–65 at ʻIolani Palace
    • 272 at ʻIolani Barracks[3]
    • viii–14 artillery pieces
    • 1 Gatling gun
Casualties and losses
None 1 wounded

The overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom began on Jan 16, 1893, with a insurrection d'état against Queen Liliʻuokalani on the isle of Oahu led by the Committee of Safety, composed of seven foreign residents and six not-aboriginal Hawaiian Kingdom subjects of American descent in Honolulu.[4] [five] The Committee prevailed upon American minister John Fifty. Stevens to telephone call in the U.South. Marines to protect the national interest of the Us of America. The insurgents established the Republic of Hawaii, just their ultimate goal was the annexation of the islands to the The states, which occurred in 1898.

The 1993 Amends Resolution by the U.S. Congress concedes that "the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii occurred with the active participation of agents and citizens of the United states of america and [...] the Native Hawaiian people never directly relinquished to the U.s. their claims to their inherent sovereignty equally a people over their national lands, either through the Kingdom of Hawaii or through a plebiscite or referendum". Debates regarding the event play an of import office in the Hawaiian sovereignty movement.

Background [edit]

The Kamehameha Dynasty was the reigning monarchy of the Hawaiian Kingdom, offset with its founding by Kamehameha I in 1795, until the death of Kamehameha V in 1872 and Lunalilo in 1874.[6] On July half-dozen, 1846, U.S. Secretary of State John C. Calhoun, on behalf of President Tyler, formally recognized Hawaii's independence under the reign of Kamehameha Three.[7] As a result of the recognition of Hawaiian independence, the Hawaiian Kingdom entered into treaties with the major nations of the globe[8] and established over ninety legations and consulates in multiple seaports and cities.[nine] The kingdom would continue for some other 21 years until its overthrow in 1893 with the autumn of the House of Kalākaua.[ten]

Sugar reciprocity [edit]

Sugar had been a major export from Hawaii since Helm James Cook arrived in 1778.[11] The first permanent plantation in the islands was on Kauai in 1835. William Hooper leased 980 acres (4 km²) of land from Kamehameha Iii and began growing sugar cane. Inside thirty years there would exist plantations on four of the main islands. Sugar had completely altered Hawaii'southward economic system.[12]

The influence of the The states in Hawaiian authorities began with American-born plantation owners advocating for fair representation in the Kingdom'due south politics, owing to the pregnant revenue enhancement contributions made from the plantations to both the Regal family and national economy. This was driven by missionary organized religion and the economics of the saccharide industry. Pressure from these foreign-born politicians was beingness felt by the King and chiefs with demands of state tenure. The 1839 Hawaiian Bill of Rights, as well known equally the 1839 Constitution of Hawaii, was an attempt by Kamehameha Three and his chiefs to guarantee that the Hawaiian people would not lose their tenured state, and provided the groundwork for a free enterprise arrangement.[13] Afterward a five-month occupation by George Paulet in 1843, Kamehameha Three relented to the foreign advisors to individual land demands with the Great Māhele, distributing the lands equally pushed on heavily past the missionaries, including Gerrit P. Judd.[xiv] During the 1850s, the U.South. import tariff on sugar from Hawaii was much higher than the import tariffs Hawaiians were charging the U.S., and Kamehameha III sought reciprocity.[15] The monarch wished to lower the tariffs beingness paid out to the U.South. while nonetheless maintaining the Kingdom's sovereignty and making Hawaiian sugar competitive with other foreign markets. In 1854 Kamehameha Three proposed a policy of reciprocity between the countries but the proposal died in the U.Due south. Senate.[16]

Equally early on every bit 1873, a The states armed forces commission recommended attempting to obtain Ford Island in exchange for the taxation-complimentary importation of sugar to the U.S.[17] Major Full general John Schofield, U.S. commander of the military division of the Pacific, and Brevet Brigadier Full general Burton S. Alexander arrived in Hawaii to ascertain its defensive capabilities. United States control of Hawaii was considered vital for the defense force of the west coast of the United States, and they were especially interested in Pu'uloa, Pearl Harbor.[18] The auction of one of Hawaii'south harbors was proposed by Charles Reed Bishop, a foreigner who had married into the Kamehameha family, had risen in the government to be Hawaiian Minister of Strange Diplomacy, and owned a land home near Pu'uloa. He showed the two U.S. officers around the lochs, although his wife, Bernice Pauahi Bishop, privately disapproved of selling Hawaiian lands. As monarch, William Charles Lunalilo, was content to let Bishop run almost all business affairs but the ceding of lands would go unpopular with the native Hawaiians. Many islanders thought that all the islands, rather than just Pearl Harbor, might be lost and opposed whatever cession of state. By Nov 1873, Lunalilo canceled negotiations and returned to drinking, against his medico's advice; his health declined swiftly, and he died on February 3, 1874.[18]

Lunalilo left no heirs. The legislature was empowered by the constitution to elect the monarch in these instances[19] and chose David Kalākaua every bit the next monarch.[xx] The new ruler was pressured by the U.S. authorities to surrender Pearl Harbor to the Navy.[twenty] Kalākaua was concerned that this would atomic number 82 to looting by the U.Southward. and to the contravention of the traditions of the Hawaiian people, who believed that the land ('Āina) was fertile, sacred, and not for sale to anyone.[xx] In 1874 through 1875, Kalākaua traveled to the United states for a state visit to Washington, DC to help gain support for a new treaty.[21] [22] Congress agreed to the Reciprocity Treaty of 1875 for seven years in substitution for Ford Island.[23] [24] After the treaty, carbohydrate product expanded from 12,000 acres (49 km2) of subcontract land to 125,000 acres (510 km2) in 1891.[25] At the terminate of the seven-year reciprocity understanding, the Usa showed petty interest in renewal.[23]

Rebellion of 1887 and the Bayonet Constitution [edit]

On January 20, 1887, the Usa began leasing Pearl Harbor.[26] Presently after, a grouping of mostly non-Hawaiians calling themselves the Hawaiian Patriotic League began the Rebellion of 1887.[27] They drafted their own constitution on July six, 1887.[28] The new constitution was written by Lorrin Thurston, the Hawaiian Minister of the Interior who used the Hawaiian militia as threat against Kalākaua.[26] Kalākaua was forced under threat of assassination[29] to dismiss his cabinet ministers and sign a new constitution which greatly lessened his power.[20] It would go known every bit the "Bayonet Constitution" because of the threat of force used.[26]

The Bayonet Constitution immune the monarch to appoint cabinet ministers, but had stripped him of the ability to dismiss them without approval from the Legislature.[28] : 152 Eligibility to vote for the House of Nobles was as well altered, stipulating that both candidates and voters were at present required to own property valuing at least three thousand dollars, or accept an annual income of no less than half-dozen hundred dollars.[30] This resulted in disenfranchising two-thirds of the native Hawaiians likewise as other ethnic groups who had previously held the correct to vote but were no longer able to meet the new voting requirements.[31] This new constitution benefited the white, strange plantation owners.[32] With the legislature now responsible for naturalizing citizens, Americans and Europeans could retain their home country citizenship and vote as citizens of the kingdom.[33] Along with voting privileges, Americans could now run for office and still retain their United States citizenship, something not afforded in whatsoever other nation of the world[34] and even allowed Americans to vote without becoming naturalized.[35] Asian immigrants were completely shut out and were no longer able to larn citizenship or vote at all.[36]

At the fourth dimension of the Bayonet Constitution Grover Cleveland was president, and his secretary of state Thomas F. Bayard sent written instructions to the American minister George Due west. Merrill that in the upshot of another revolution in Hawaii, it was a priority to protect American commerce, lives and property. Bayard specified, "the help of the officers of our Government vessels, if found necessary, will therefore exist promptly afforded to promote the reign of law and respect for orderly regime in Hawaii." In July 1889, there was a pocket-sized scale rebellion, and Minister Merrill landed Marines to protect Americans; the State Department explicitly approved his activity. Merrill's replacement, minister John L. Stevens, read those official instructions, and followed them in his controversial actions of 1893.[37]

Wilcox Rebellion of 1888 [edit]

The Wilcox Rebellion of 1888 was a plot to overthrow King David Kalākaua, king of Hawaii, and replace him with his sister in a coup d'état in response to increased political tension between the legislature and the king after the 1887 constitution. Kalākaua'southward sister, Princess Liliʻuokalani and his married woman, Queen Kapiolani, returned from Queen Victoria's Gold Jubilee immediately later news reached them in Uk.[38]

In October 1887, Robert William Wilcox, a native Hawaiian officeholder and veteran of the Italian armed forces, returned to Hawaii.[39] The funding had stopped for his study program when the new constitution was signed. Wilcox, Charles B. Wilson, Princess Liliʻuokalani, and Samuel Nowlein plotted to overthrow Male monarch Kalākaua to replace him with his sister, Liliʻuokalani.[ citation needed ] They had 300 Hawaiian conspirators subconscious in ʻIolani Billet and an alliance with the Royal Baby-sit, but the plot was accidentally discovered in January 1888, less than 48 hours earlier the defection would take been initiated.[40] No one was prosecuted but Wilcox was exiled. Then on Feb xi, 1888, Wilcox left Hawaii for San Francisco, intending to return to Italy with his wife.

Princess Liliʻuokalani was offered the throne several times past the Missionary Party who had forced the Bayonet Constitution on her brother, but she believed she would become a powerless figurehead like her brother and rejected the offers outright.[41]

Liliʻuokalani attempts to re-write Constitution [edit]

In November 1889, Kalākaua traveled to San Francisco for his wellness, staying at the Palace Hotel. He died there on Jan 20, 1891.[42] His sister Liliʻuokalani causeless the throne in the heart of an economic crisis. The McKinley Act had bedridden the Hawaiian saccharide industry past removing the duties on sugar imports from other countries into the US, eliminating the previous Hawaiian advantage gained via the Reciprocity Treaty of 1875.[43] Many Hawaii businesses and citizens felt pressure from the loss of revenue; in response Liliʻuokalani proposed a lottery system to enhance money for her government. Too proposed was a controversial opium licensing pecker.[44] Her ministers, and closest friends, were all opposed to this program; they unsuccessfully tried to dissuade her from pursuing these initiatives, both of which came to be used against her in the brewing ramble crisis.[45]

Liliʻuokalani's main desire was to restore ability to the monarch past abrogating the 1887 Bayonet Constitution and promulgating a new one, an thought that seems to have been broadly supported past the Hawaiian population.[46] The 1893 Constitution would have increased suffrage by reducing some property requirements, and eliminated the voting privileges extended to European and American residents. It would have disenfranchised many resident European and American businessmen who were not citizens of Hawaii. The Queen toured several of the islands on horseback, talking to the people about her ideas and receiving overwhelming support, including a lengthy petition in support of a new constitution. Still, when the Queen informed her cabinet of her plans, they withheld their support due to an agreement of what her opponents' probable response to these plans would be.[47]

Though in that location were threats to Hawaii's sovereignty throughout the Kingdom's history, information technology was not until the signing of the Bayonet Constitution in 1887 that this threat began to be realized. The precipitating event[48] leading to the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom on January 17, 1893, was the attempt past Queen Liliʻuokalani to promulgate a new constitution that would have strengthened the power of the monarch relative to the legislature, where Euro-American business organization elites held disproportionate ability. The stated goals of the conspirators, who were non-native Hawaiian Kingdom subjects (five United states nationals, one English national, and one German national)[49] were to depose the queen, overthrow the monarchy, and seek Hawaii's annexation to the United States.[fifty] [51]

1893 Hawaiian insurrection d'état and overthrow of the kingdom [edit]

The overthrow of the monarchy was started by newspaper publisher Lorrin Thurston, a Hawaiian subject and former Government minister of the Interior who was the grandson of American missionaries,[52] and formally led by the Chairman of the Committee of Safety, Henry E. Cooper, an American lawyer. They derived their support primarily from the American and European business organisation class residing in Hawaii and other supporters of the Reform Party of the Hawaiian Kingdom. Virtually of the leaders of the Committee of Safety that deposed the queen were U.s.a. and European citizens who were also Kingdom subjects.[53] [54] [55] They included legislators, regime officers, and a Supreme Court Justice of the Hawaiian Kingdom.[56]

On January xvi, the Align of the Kingdom, Charles B. Wilson, was tipped off by detectives to the imminent planned overthrow. Wilson requested warrants to arrest the 13-member council of the Committee of Safety, and put the Kingdom under martial law. Considering the members had strong political ties with The states Regime Minister John L. Stevens, the requests were repeatedly denied by Attorney General Arthur P. Peterson and the Queen'southward chiffonier, fearing if canonical, the arrests would escalate the situation. After a failed negotiation with Thurston,[57] Wilson began to collect his men for the confrontation. Wilson and Captain of the Royal Household Guard, Samuel Nowlein, had rallied a force of 496 men who were kept at hand to protect the Queen.[2]

Leialoha, a native policeman who tried to end a carriage taking weapons to the Committee of Safety

The events began on January 17, 1893, when John Proficient, a revolutionist, shot Leialoha, a native policeman who was trying to stop a wagon carrying weapons to the Committee of Prophylactic led by Lorrin Thurston.[58] The Commission of Safety feared the shooting would bring government forces to rout out the conspirators and stop the overthrow before it could begin. The Committee of Prophylactic initiated the overthrow past organizing armed non-native men, under their leadership, intending to depose Queen Liliʻuokalani. The forces garrisoned Ali'iolani Hale across the street from ʻIolani Palace and waited for the Queen's response.[51]

Every bit these events were unfolding, the Committee of Safety expressed concern for the safety and belongings of American residents in Honolulu.[59]

On January 17, 1893, the Chairman of the Committee of Safety, Henry E. Cooper, addressed a oversupply assembled in forepart of ʻIolani Palace (the official royal residence) and read aloud a declaration that formally deposed Queen Liliʻuokalani, abolished the Hawaiian monarchy, and established a Provisional Government of Hawaii under President Sanford B. Dole.

United States involvement [edit]

John L. Stevens, a The states diplomat, supported the new government in Hawaii with a small Marine detachment.

President Harrison's Secretary of State John W. Foster in 1892–1894 actively worked for the looting of the contained Republic of Hawaii. Pro-American business interests had overthrown the Queen when she rejected constitutional limits on her powers. The new government realized that Hawaii was too small and militarily weak to survive in a world of aggressive imperialism, especially on the part of Japan. It was eager for American annexation. Foster believed Hawaii was vital to American interests in the Pacific.[60]

The annexation program was coordinated past the master American diplomat on the scene, John L. Stevens. He decided to ship in a U.S. military detachment after the Queen was deposed to back up the new government and foreclose a vacuum that might open the way for Japan.[61] Advised near supposed threats to non-combatant American lives and belongings[62] by the Committee of Safety, Stevens obliged their request and summoned 162 U.Due south. sailors and Marines from the USS Boston to land on Oahu nether orders of neutrality and have up positions at the U.South. Legation, Consulate, and Arion Hall on the afternoon of January xvi, 1893.[63]

The deposed Queen was kept in ʻIolani Palace under house arrest. The American sailors and Marines did not enter the Palace grounds or accept over whatever buildings, and never fired a shot, just their presence served effectively. The Queen never had an ground forces, the local police did not support her, and no one mobilized whatsoever pro-royalist forces. Historian William Russ states, "the injunction to prevent fighting of any kind made it impossible for the monarchy to protect itself."[64] Due to the Queen's desire "to avoid any collision of armed forces, and maybe the loss of life" for her subjects and afterward some deliberation, at the urging of advisers and friends, the Queen ordered her forces to surrender. The Honolulu Rifles took over government buildings, disarmed the Royal Guard, and declared a provisional government.[51]

According to the Queen'due south Book, her friend and minister J.S. Walker "came and told me that he had come on a painful duty, that the opposition party had requested that I should abdicate." After consulting with her ministers, including Walker, the Queen concluded that "since the troops of the Us had been landed to back up the revolutionists, by the order of the American minister, it would be impossible for us to make any resistance".[65] : 387 Despite repeated claims that the overthrow was "bloodless", the Queen's Book notes that Liliʻuokalani received "friends [who] expressed their sympathy in person; amongst these Mrs. J. S. Walker, who had lost her husband past the treatment he received from the hands of the insurgents. He was one of many who from persecution had succumbed to death."[65] : 296

Immediate annexation was prevented by President Grover Cleveland who told Congress:

... the military demonstration upon the soil of Honolulu was of itself an human action of war; unless made either with the consent of the government of Hawaii or for the bona fide purpose of protecting the imperiled lives and property of citizens of the United states. But there is no pretense of any such consent on the role of the government of the queen ... the existing authorities, instead of requesting the presence of an armed force, protested confronting information technology. There is as petty basis for the pretense that forces were landed for the security of American life and holding. If so, they would accept been stationed in the vicinity of such holding and so as to protect it, instead of at a distance then equally to control the Hawaiian Government Building and palace ... When these armed men were landed, the metropolis of Honolulu was in its customary orderly and peaceful condition ...[66]

The Commonwealth of Hawaii was however alleged in 1894 by the same parties which had established the conditional government. Amongst them was Lorrin A. Thurston, a drafter of the Bayonet Constitution. The Commission of Safety asked Sanford Dole to become President of the forcibly instated Republic.[67] : 596 He agreed, and became President on July 4, 1894.

Aftermath [edit]

A provisional regime was set upwardly with the strong support of the Honolulu Rifles, a militia group which had defended the system of regime promulgated past the Bayonet Constitution confronting the Wilcox rebellion of 1889.[51]

The Queen's statement yielding authority, on January 17, 1893, protested confronting the overthrow:

I Liliʻuokalani, by the Grace of God and under the Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom, Queen, do hereby solemnly protest against any and all acts done against myself and the Ramble Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom by certain persons claiming to take established a Provisional Government of and for this Kingdom.

That I yield to the superior strength of the United states of America whose Minister Plenipotentiary, His Excellency John L. Stevens, has acquired Us troops to be landed at Honolulu and declared that he would support the Provisional Authorities.

Now to avoid any collision of armed forces, and perhaps the loss of life, I do this under protest and impelled by said force yield my authority until such time as the Government of the United States shall, upon facts being presented to it, undo the activity of its representatives and reinstate me in the authorization which I claim equally the Constitutional Sovereign of the Hawaiian Islands.[68]

On December 19, 1898 the queen would ameliorate the declaration with the "Memorial of Queen Liliuokalani in relation to the Crown lands of Hawaii", further protesting the overthrow and loss of holding.[69]

Response [edit]

Us [edit]

Newly inaugurated President Grover Cleveland called for an investigation into the overthrow. This investigation was conducted by sometime Congressman James Henderson Blount. Blount ended in his report on July 17, 1893, "United States diplomatic and military representatives had abused their authorisation and were responsible for the change in government."[70] Minister Stevens was recalled, and the military commander of forces in Hawaiʻi was forced to resign his commission.[seventy] President Cleveland stated, "Substantial wrong has thus been washed which a due regard for our national character likewise as the rights of the injured people requires nosotros should endeavor to repair the monarchy." Cleveland farther stated in his 1893 Land of the Union Address that, "Upon the facts adult information technology seemed to me the only honorable form for our Government to pursue was to disengage the incorrect that had been done by those representing u.s.a. and to restore as far as practicable the status existing at the time of our forcible intervention."[66] The affair was referred past Cleveland to Congress on Dec 18, 1893, after the Queen refused to take amnesty for the traitors as a condition of reinstatement. Hawaii President Sanford Dole was presented a need for reinstatement past Minister Willis, who had non realized Cleveland had already sent the affair to Congress—Dole flatly refused Cleveland's demands to reinstate the Queen.[ commendation needed ]

The Senate Foreign Relations Commission, chaired by Senator John Tyler Morgan (D-Alabama) and composed mostly of senators in favor of annexation, initiated their own investigation to discredit Blount's before report, using pro-annexationist affidavits from Hawaii, and testimony provided to the U.S. Senate in Washington, D.C. The Morgan Study contradicted the Blount Written report, and exonerated Minister Stevens and the U.Southward. war machine troops finding them "not guilty" of involvement in the overthrow. Cleveland became stalled with his earlier efforts to restore the queen, and adopted a position of recognition of the so-chosen Provisional Government and the Republic of Hawaii which followed.[71] [72]

The Native Hawaiian Written report Committee of the United States Congress in its 1983 concluding written report plant no historical, legal, or moral obligation for the U.S. government to provide reparations, assistance, or grouping rights to Native Hawaiians.[73]

In 1993, the 100th anniversary of the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom, Congress passed a resolution, which President Bill Clinton signed into law, offering an amends to Native Hawaiians on behalf of the United states for its interest in the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom. The law is known every bit the Apology Resolution, and represents one of the few times that the Usa government has formally apologized for its actions.[74]

International [edit]

Every government with a diplomatic presence in Hawaii, except for the United Kingdom, recognized the Provisional Authorities within 48 hours of the overthrow via their consulates. Countries recognizing the new Provisional Government included Chile, Austria-Hungary, Mexico, Russia, the netherlands, Imperial Deutschland, Sweden, Espana, Imperial Japan,[75] Italy, Portugal, Kingdom of denmark, Belgium, China, Republic of peru, and France.[76] When the Republic of Hawaii was alleged on July four, 1894, firsthand de facto recognition was given by every nation with diplomatic relations with Hawaii, except for Britain, whose response came in November 1894.[77]

Hawaiian counter-revolution [edit]

A 4-solar day uprising between January half-dozen–9, 1895, began with an attempted coup d'état to restore the monarchy, and included battles between royalists and the republican rebels. After, after a weapons enshroud was found on the palace grounds after the attempted rebellion in 1895, Queen Lili'uokalani was placed under abort, tried past a military tribunal of the Democracy of Hawai'i, convicted of misprision of treason and imprisoned in her ain home. On January 24, Lili'uokalani abdicated, formally ending the Hawaiian monarchy.[78]

Republic, United States looting, United States Territory [edit]

The Kūʻē Petitions. Several pro-royalist groups submitted petitions confronting annexation in 1897. In 1900 those groups disbanded and formed the Hawaiian Independent Party, under the leadership of Robert Wilcox, the first congressional representative from the Territory of Hawaii

The Committee of Safety declared Sanford Dole President of the new Provisional Regime of the Kingdom of Hawai'i on January 17, 1893, just removing the queen, her chiffonier, and her align from office.[67] : 581–587 On July 4, 1894, the Republic of Hawai'i was proclaimed. Dole was president of both governments. Every bit a republic, it was the government's intention to campaign for Hawaii's annexation to the The states. The rationale behind the annexation of Hawaii included a strong economic component—Hawaiian goods and services which were exported to the mainland would not exist subjected to United States tariffs, and the United states of america and Hawaii would both benefit from each other's domestic bounties, if Hawaii was part of the U.s..[67] : 649–650

In 1897, William McKinley succeeded Cleveland as United States president. In his starting time year in role, the U.S. Senate failed twice to ratify a Treaty to Annex the Hawaiian Islands. A yr afterward, he signed the Newlands Resolution, which stated that the looting of Hawaii would occur on July vii, 1898. The formal ceremony which marked the annexation of Hawaii to the United States was held at the Iolani Palace on August 12, 1898. Almost no Native Hawaiians attended the annexation ceremony, and those few Hawaiians who were on the streets wore royalist ilima blossoms in their hats or pilus, and on their breasts, they wore Hawaiian flags which were emblazoned with the motto: Kuu Hae Aloha ('my beloved flag').[79] Most of the 40,000 Native Hawaiians, including Lili'uokalani and the Hawaiian royal family, protested against the illegal action past shuttering themselves in their homes. "When the news of the Looting came, information technology was bitterer than decease to me", Lili'uokalani's niece, Princess Kaʻiulani, told the San Francisco Chronicle. "It was bad enough to lose the throne, simply it was infinitely worse to accept the flag go down."[80] The Hawaiian flag was lowered for the terminal time while the Royal Hawaiian Band played the Hawaiian national anthem, Hawaiʻi Ponoʻī.

The Hawaiian Islands, together with the distant Palmyra Isle and the Stewart Islands, became the Territory of Hawaii, a The states organized incorporated territory, with a new regime which was established on February 22, 1900. Sanford Dole was appointed the territory'southward commencement governor.[81] The Iolani Palace served as the capitol building of the Hawaiian government until 1969.

Run across besides [edit]

  • Democratic Revolution of 1954
  • Hawaii – historical novel by James Michener has fictionalized account of the Overthrow in Chapter Iv "From the Starving Village"
  • Hawaiian sovereignty motility
  • Kalākaua Dynasty
  • Paulet Affair
  • Unfamiliar Fishes by Sarah Vowell
  • Usa involvement in authorities change

References [edit]

  1. ^ U.South. Navy History site. History.navy.mil (March 22, 2005). Retrieved on July 6, 2011.
  2. ^ a b Young, Lucien (1899). The Real Hawaii. Doubleday & McClure company. p. 252.
  3. ^ Kuykendall, Ralph (1967). The Hawaiian Kingdom, Volume 3. Academy of Hawaii Press. p. 605. ISBN0-87022-433-6.
  4. ^ Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates of the Congress. U.S. Regime Press Office. 1894. WHO WERE THE PARTIES THAT ASKED FOR AMERICAN AID. Half-dozen of them were Hawaiians, one English language, and one German; v were Americans, but residents of Honolulu; a majority alien to us.
  5. ^ Kam, Ralph Thomas; Lyons, Jeffrey 1000. (2019). "Remembering the Committee of Safety: Identifying the Citizenship, Descent, and Occupations of the Men Who Overthrew the Monarchy". The Hawaiian Periodical of History. Honolulu: Hawaiian Historical Society. 53: 31–54. doi:10.1353/hjh.2019.0002. ISSN 2169-7639. OCLC 60626541. S2CID 212795443.
  6. ^ MargHomans; Adrienne Munich (October two, 1997). Remaking Queen Victoria. Cambridge University Press. pp. 147–. ISBN978-0-521-57485-3.
  7. ^ United States. Dept. of State (1895). Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States. U.S. Authorities Printing Part. p. 12.
  8. ^ United states. Congress. House. Committee on Didactics and Labor. Subcommittee on Economical Opportunity (1977). Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, Amendments of 1977: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Xc-fifth Congress, Start Session, on H.R. 7577... U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 92.
  9. ^ "Historical Collections of The Hawaiian Islands – Treaties, Conventions, and International Agreements of the Kingdom of Hawai'i". usgwarchives.cyberspace. usgwarchives.net. Retrieved December thirty, 2014.
  10. ^ Julia Flynn Siler (January 2012). Lost Kingdom: Hawaii's Terminal Queen, the Carbohydrate Kings and America's Kickoff Imperial Gamble. Atlantic Monthly Press. pp. 220–. ISBN978-0-8021-2001-four.
  11. ^ Deerr, Noel (1949). The History of Sugar, Volume ane. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd. OCLC 833266489.
  12. ^ Robin Santos Doak (January one, 2003). Hawaii: The Aloha State. World Annual Library. p. 11. ISBN978-0-8368-5149-6.
  13. ^ "Kingdom of Hawaii Constitution of 1839". The Morgan Written report. Retrieved December 3, 2010.
    "1839 Hawaiian Beak of Rights". Gratuitous Hawaii. Retrieved December 3, 2010.
  14. ^ Haunani-Kay Trask (January 1, 1999). From a Native Girl: Colonialism and Sovereignty in Hawaiʻi. University of Hawaii Printing. p. 7. ISBN978-0-8248-2059-6.
  15. ^ Pratt, Helen G. (1939). In Hawaii: A Hundred Years . New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. p. 249. OCLC 12372595.
  16. ^ The Psychologists of Prejudice and Discrimination. ABC-CLIO. 2004. p. 1. ISBN978-0-275-98234-8.
  17. ^ "Ford Island History". State of Hawaii. Retrieved May 17, 2014.
  18. ^ a b Dye, Bob (January 1, 1997). Merchant Prince of the Sandalwood Mountains: Afong and the Chinese in Hawai'i. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press. p. 115. ISBN978-0-8248-1772-5.
  19. ^ Daniel South. Murphree (March 9, 2012). Native America: A Country-by-Land Historical Encyclopedia [three volumes]. California: ABC-CLIO. p. 268. ISBN978-0-313-38127-0.
  20. ^ a b c d MacLeod, Roy M.; Philip F. Rehbock (January 1994). Darwin's Laboratory: Evolutionary Theory and Natural History in the Pacific. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press. p. 494. ISBN978-0-8248-1613-i.
  21. ^ Donald Dalton Johnson (Jan one, 1995). The United States in the Pacific: Private Interests and Public Policies, 1784–1899. Greenwood Publishing Grouping. p. 105. ISBN978-0-275-95055-2.
  22. ^ Jon 1000. Van Dyke (2008). Who Owns the Crown Lands of Hawai_i?. University of Hawaii Press. p. 118. ISBN978-0-8248-3211-vii.
  23. ^ a b Pratt, Helen Thousand. (1939). In Hawaii: A Hundred Years . New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. pp. 260=261. OCLC 12372595.
  24. ^ Curtis, Catherine (1966). Builders of Hawaii. Hawaii: The Kamehameha Schools Press. p. 218. ASIN B00285NRCI.
  25. ^ Charles W. Calhoun (September eleven, 2006). The Golden Historic period: Perspectives on the Origins of Modern America. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 316–. ISBN978-0-7425-8168-5.
  26. ^ a b c Mirza PhD, Rocky Yard. (September 2, 2010). American Invasions: Canada to Transitional islamic state of afghanistan, 1775 to 2010: Canada to Afghanistan, 1775 to 2010. Indiana: Trafford Publishing. p. 80. ISBN978-1-4669-5688-9.
  27. ^ Anne Lee (March xviii, 2011). The Hawaii State Constitution. New York: Oxford Academy Press. p. vii. ISBN978-0-19-987796-6.
  28. ^ a b Van Dyke, Jon 1000 (2008). Who Owns the Crown Lands of Hawai_i?. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Printing. p. 123. ISBN978-0-8248-3211-vii.
  29. ^ Kamaka'eha, Lydia-Lili'uokalani (1898). "Chapter 29: 'The Bayonet Constitution'". Hawaiʻi's Story past Hawaiʻi's Queen. digital.library.upenn.edu. Boston: Lee and Shepard. ISBN9788822853684. OCLC 966288973, 903366051, 2387226. Retrieved Oct 27, 2017.
  30. ^ Sarah Vowell (March 22, 2011). Unfamiliar Fishes. Penguin Group US. p. ninety. ISBN978-i-101-48645-0.
  31. ^ John H. Chambers (2009). Hawaii. Interlink Books. pp. 184–85. ISBN978-i-56656-615-5.
  32. ^ William Ming Liu; Derek Kenji Iwamoto; Mark H. Chae (January 19, 2011). Culturally Responsive Counseling with Asian American Men. Routledge. p. 133. ISBN978-ane-135-96833-5.
  33. ^ William Michael Morgan (2011). Pacific Gibraltar: U.S.-Japanese Rivalry Over the Annexation of Hawai'i, 1885–1898. Naval Institute Press. p. 57. ISBN978-1-59114-529-5.
  34. ^ James Bradley (November 24, 2009). The Imperial Prowl: A Secret History of Empire and War . Fiddling, Brown. p. 110. ISBN978-0-316-03966-6.
  35. ^ Noenoe 1000. Silva (September seven, 2004). Aloha Betrayed: Native Hawaiian Resistance to American Colonialism. Knuckles University Press. p. 126. ISBN0-8223-3349-X.
  36. ^ Florencia Mallon (December thirty, 2011). Decolonizing Native Histories: Collaboration, Knowledge, and Language in the Americas. Duke Academy Press. p. 31. ISBN978-0-8223-5152-8.
  37. ^ Campbell, Charles Soutter (1976). The transformation of American strange relations, 1865–1900. New York: Harper & Row. pp. 178–79. ISBN978-0-06-090531-half-dozen. OCLC 2120977.
  38. ^ Liliuokalani (1898). Hawaii's Story. Tothrop, Lee & Shepard Co. p. 174.
  39. ^ Liliuokalani (1898). Hawaii's Story. Tothrop, Lee & Shepard Co. p. 195.
  40. ^ Foreign Relations of the Us 1894: Affairs in Hawaii. Regime Printing Office. 1895. p. 670.
  41. ^ Liliuokalani (1898). Hawaii's Story. Tothrop, Lee & Shepard Co. p. 186.
  42. ^ Richard Harned (February eleven, 2009). The Palace Hotel. Arcadia Publishing. p. 76. ISBN978-1-4396-3655-8.
  43. ^ Paul R. Spickard; Joanne L. Rondilla; Debbie Hippolite Wright (January 1, 2002). Pacific Diaspora: Island Peoples in the United states of america and Across the Pacific. University of Hawaii Press. p. 316. ISBN978-0-8248-2619-2.
  44. ^ Eric Tyrone Lowery Love (2004). Race Over Empire: Racism and U.S. Imperialism, 1865–1900. Univ of N Carolina Printing. pp. 107–. ISBN978-0-8078-5565-2.
  45. ^ United states. Department of State (1895). Foreign Relations of the The states. U.S. Authorities Printing Part. p. 496.
  46. ^ Russ, The Hawaiian Revolution, p. 67: "She ... defended her act[ions] past showing that, out of a possible ix,500 native voters in 1892, vi,500 asked for a new Constitution."
  47. ^ Daws, Shoal of Fourth dimension, p271: The Queen's new chiffonier "had been in part less than a week, and any they idea about the demand for a new constitution... they knew enough nigh the temper of the queen's opponents to realize that they would endure the chance to challenge her, and no minister of the crown could look forward... to that confrontation."
  48. ^ Kuykendall, Ralph (1967). The Hawaiian Kingdom, Book 3. University of Hawaii Press. p. 582. ISBN0-87022-433-half-dozen.
  49. ^ Library, University of Hawaii at Manoa Hamilton. "Annexation of Hawaii – Academy of Hawaii at Manoa Library". libweb.hawaii.edu.
  50. ^ Kuykendall, Ralph (1967). The Hawaiian Kingdom, Volume 3. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 533 and 587–88. ISBN0-87022-433-6. From Kuykendall, p. 587-588: "W.D. Alexander (History of Later Years of the Hawaiian Monarchy and the Revolution of 1893, p. 37) gives the following as the wording of Thurston's motion [to launch the coup]: 'That preliminary steps be taken at one time to form and declare a Provisional Regime with a view to annexation to the United States.' Thurston after wrote that his motion was 'substantially as follows: "I move that information technology is the sense of this coming together that the solution of the present state of affairs is looting to the United States."'(Memoirs, p. 250) Lt. Lucien Immature (The Boston at Hawaii, p. 175) gives the following version of the motion: 'Resolved, That it is the sense of this committee that in view of the present unsatisfactory state of affairs, the proper class to pursue is to abolish the monarchy and utilise for annexation to the U.s.a..'"
  51. ^ a b c d Russ, William Adam (1992). The Hawaiian Revolution (1893–94). Associated University Presses. p. 90. ISBN0-945636-53-9.
  52. ^ Roark, James L.; Johnson, Michael P.; Cohen, Patricia Cline; Stage, Sarah; Hartmann, Susan M. (January 9, 2012). The American Promise, Combined Book: A History of the United States. Bedford/St. Martin's. p. 660. ISBN978-0-312-66312-4.
  53. ^ Vernon One thousand. Briggs (Jan 1, 2003). Mass Immigration and the National Interest: Policy Directions for the New Century . 1000.E. Sharpe. p. 72. ISBN978-0-7656-0934-2.
  54. ^ Vernon M. Briggs (2001). Clearing and American Unionism . Cornell University Press. p. 58. ISBN0-8014-8710-2.
  55. ^ Tom Ginsburg; Rosalind Dixon (January 1, 2011). Comparative Ramble Police. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 181. ISBN978-0-85793-121-4.
  56. ^ Andrade Jr., Ernest (1996). Unconquerable Rebel: Robert Westward. Wilcox and Hawaiian Politics, 1880–1903. University Press of Colorado. p. 130. ISBN0-87081-417-6.
  57. ^ Twombly, Alexander (1900). Hawaii and its people. Silver, Burdett and company. p. 333.
  58. ^ "An Officer Shot – He Suspected There Was Ammunition on the Railroad vehicle". The Daily Bulletin. Vol. Five, no. 626. Honolulu: J. W. Robertson. January 17, 1893. p. 3. Retrieved July 27, 2016.
  59. ^ The Morgan Report, p808–809, "At the asking of many citizens, whose wives and families were helpless and in terror of an expected uprising of the mob, which would burn and destroy, a request was made and signed by all of the committee, addressed to Minister Stevens, that troops might be landed to protect houses and private belongings.
  60. ^ Michael J. Devine, "John West. Foster and the Struggle for the Annexation of Hawaii." Pacific Historical Review 46.1 (1977): 29–50 online.
  61. ^ William Michael Morgan, "The anti-Japanese origins of the Hawaiian Annexation treaty of 1897." Diplomatic History 6.1 (1982): 23–44.Online
  62. ^ Kinzer, S. (2006) America'south Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq. p. xxx. [Minister Stevens] "certainly overstepped his authorization when he brought troops aground, specially since he knew that the 'general alarm and terror' of which the Committee of Condom had complained was a fiction."
  63. ^ Burr, Lawrence (December 20, 2011). US Cruisers 1883–1904: The birth of the steel navy. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 35. ISBN978-1-84603-858-7 . Retrieved January sixteen, 2018.
  64. ^ Russ, William Adam (1992). The Hawaiian Revolution (1893–94). Associated University Presses. p. 350. ISBN0-945636-43-1.
  65. ^ a b Liliuokalani (1898). Hawaii's Story by Hawaii's Queen, Liliuokalani. Lee and Shepard. p. 387. Retrieved January 15, 2018.
  66. ^ a b Grover Cleveland's Sixth State of the Union Address – via Wikisource.
  67. ^ a b c Ralph Simpson Kuykendall (1967). Hawaiian Kingdom 1874–1893, the Kalakaua Dynasty. Vol. three. University of Hawaii Printing. ISBN978-0-87022-433-ane.
  68. ^ "Liliuokalani, 1893 to Sanford B. Dole". University of Hawaii. Retrieved January fifteen, 2018.
  69. ^ Memorial of Queen Liliuokalani in relation to the Crown lands of Hawaii, 12/19/1898. National Archives. File Unit: Petitions and Memorials Referred to the Committee on the Territiories of the 55th Congress Regarding Hawaii, 1825 - 1946. The U.Southward. National Athenaeum and Records Administration. December xix, 1898. Retrieved January 4, 2015.
  70. ^ a b Pub.L. 103–150
  71. ^ The Blount Report, p1342, "In reply to the direct question from Mr. Parker as to whether this was the concluding conclusion of the Senate, I said that in my opinion it was last."
  72. ^ Grover Cleveland's second Annual Message, Dec 3, 1894 – "Since communicating the voluminous correspondence in regard to Hawaii and the activeness taken by the Senate and House of Representatives on certain questions submitted to the judgment and wider discretion of Congress the organization of a regime in place of the provisional arrangement which followed the deposition of the Queen has been announced, with evidence of its constructive operation. The recognition usual in such cases has been accorded the new Government."
  73. ^ Native Hawaiian Report Commission: Run across Conclusions and Recommendations p.27 and also Existing Law, Native Hawaiians, and Compensation, pgs 333–339 and pgs 341–345 Archived July 8, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. Wiki.grassrootinstitute.org. Retrieved on July vi, 2011.
  74. ^ Lewis, Danny. "Five Times the United States Officially Apologized". Smithsonian . Retrieved November 14, 2018.
  75. ^ During the overthrow, the Japanese Purple Navy gunboat Naniwa was docked at Pearl Harbor. The gunboat's commander, Heihachiro Togo, who later on commanded the Japanese battleship fleet at Tsushima, refused to accede to the Conditional Government'due south demands that he strike the colors of the Kingdom, merely later lowered the colors on order of the Japanese Regime. Along with every other international legations in Honolulu, the Japanese Consulate-General, Suburo Fujii, quickly recognized the Provisional Regime as the "de facto" legitimate successor to the monarchy.
  76. ^ The Morgan Report, p 1103–1111. Morganreport.org (Feb 11, 2006). Retrieved on July 6, 2011.
  77. ^ Andrade, Ernest (1996). The Unconquerable Rebel. The University Press of Colorado. p. 147. ISBN0-87081-417-6. The provisional government, with all its faults, had major difficulties in obtaining recognition, especially from Cleveland, and information technology was non considered likely that the republic would have whatever foreign bug. Recognition albeit de facto came near fifty-fifty more quickly than it had in 1893, for at least there was no question of a overthrow having taken place or of the government'south control of the domestic situation.
  78. ^ "Abdication of Queen Liliuokalani: Rubber at the Price of a Kingdom, of Niggling Moment At present for the Cause of the Royalists is a Lost Cause". The Morning Call. San Francisco. Feb seven, 1895. Retrieved July xix, 2010.
  79. ^ Robert W. Brockway. "Hawai'i: America'due south Marry". The Spanish American War Centennial spider web site . Retrieved April 30, 2010.
  80. ^ Michael Tighe (Baronial 9, 1998). "Hawaii'south Own: A look at a century of annexation". Associated Press. Retrieved March 30, 2010.
  81. ^ Pub.50. 56–339

External links [edit]

  • morganreport.org Online images and transcriptions of the unabridged 1894 Morgan Report
  • "Blount Report: Diplomacy in Hawaii (1893)". University of Hawaiʻi at Manoa Library.
  • "The Annexation Of Hawaii: A Collection Of Documents". Hawaiian Digital Collection. University of Hawaiʻi at Manoa Library.
  • Conklin, Kenneth R. (August 2009). "Hawaii Statehood – straightening out the history-twisters. A historical narrative defending the legitimacy of the revolution of 1893, the annexation of 1898, and the statehood vote of 1959. FULL VERSION". Hawaiian Sovereignty: Thinking Carefully About It.

gonzalezthisity.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overthrow_of_the_Hawaiian_Kingdom

0 Response to "what factors led to the annexation of hawaii in 1898"

ارسال یک نظر

اشتراک در: نظرات پیام (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel